Page Summary
bikergeek.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pi3832.livejournal.com - (no subject)
shadowriderhope.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tomatoe333.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jeffreyab.livejournal.com - (no subject)
xtatic1.livejournal.com - (no subject)
thatguychuck.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fourgotten.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dagibbs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sendthewolf.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 02:00 pm (UTC)So last night I replaced both the suspect fuel petcock AND the suspect fuel pump. And the TDM now runs reasonably well. I have a little lean popping on decel, and I think I need to synch the carbs, but all in all it's good.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 02:22 pm (UTC)As for the carb sync... just take the bike to Ray's. I gave him my Morgan CarbTune II.
Hell, you should've taken it to Ray's to do the emulsion tubes--apparently the Suzuki GS1100G he rides now is known to have the same kind of problem as the TDM with things wearing inside the carbs. As long as you keep Ray focused on the job at hand, he can do a complete carb overhaul in a reasonable amount of time.
But enough kibbitzing. I'm happy the TDM is running; it's sweet ride. And I do miss wrenching at your place.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 03:47 pm (UTC)The bike never had a fuel gauge, and with the stock petcock gone, there's no reserve anymore. I just capped the spot where the non-reserve fuel draws, and hooked a hose to the reserve line. I will have to monitor fuel consumption for a while so I know how far to go before filling the gas tank. I suppose this is not a real change, since I ran it on reserve all the time in the past, simply because the vacuum pump couldn't recover in a reasonable time when the bike went to reserve, and I was tired of coasting to the side of the road and waiting ten minutes for it to start again every time it went to reserve, and it was going to reserve when it still had more than 1/3 of a tank left. I wonder if I can retrofit it with some sort of fuel gauge?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:05 pm (UTC)And are you sure that the electric pump is pushing the same pressure as the vacuum pump was? I tried fitting a vacuum-operated pump to the Bandit to fix my weird early-switch-to-reserve problems, and it made the float heights way wrong, because there was so much more pressure in the line. (Of course, since you were just going from one pump to another, instead of from no pump to having one, this is less likely to be a problem.)
And you can always do an old fashioned fuel guage: tee into the fuel line before the pump and connect it to a bit of clear tubing that parallels the tank. The fuel in the clear bit of line will be at the same level as the fuel in the tank.
This is actually how I checked the fuel level in the float bowls when I was fiddling with putting a fuel pump on the Bandit.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:46 pm (UTC)When I took things apart to get to the emulsion tubes, one of the things I did was to try to pull the fuel hoses off the petcock. Y'know the brass tubes that the hoses fit over? When I tried to pull the hose off, the tube came out altogther. I was able to push it back in, but it wouldn't stay in there. I tried gluing it with some gasoline resistant glue, but it didn't work; the tube still pulled out way too easily.
I tried to order another stock petcock, but they're discontinued. So I got a used one off of eBay but when I examined it, the seals looked marginal; I wasn't happy with it.
The aftermarket petcock seems to be a much more solid item. But it's simpler, just one line in, one line out. I put it very close to the tank, there's room there and I can easily access it by taking off the seat. I put the hose clamps on really tight, on the segment of hose between tank and petcock, and the hose between the petcock and everything else is easy to access.
The petcock has to come out with the tank, if I'm not going to spew gasoline all over everything. I needed four hands to get the tank off before, what with the rats nest of hoses leading down to the old petcock. Now when I have to take the tank off I can turn off the new petcock and disconnect it just downstream of the tank, and easily lift the tank off by myself. Even if I managed to find a good OEM petcock I think I would prefer to keep this one in there.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:56 pm (UTC)If the bike idles fine, the float height is probably fine. And if others have gone there before you, forget I said anything.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 05:05 pm (UTC)I saved all the hoses that I pulled out of the TDM, didn't cut anything up, so if I have to put that stuff back in I can. But judging from my test ride last night, I don't think I'll need them. Nonetheless I plan to bundle everything up and store it in a labeled box in my garage, so I can get it out again if I discover some terrible problem down the line. I used a sharpie to label every hose and the spot where it was attached, so I can put them back if I have to.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 06:30 pm (UTC)I assumed the petcock was like all the others I've worked on--integral to the pick-ups that mount in the tank. Apparently, on the TDM the pickups are a seperate unit and connect to the petcock by two hoses. One hose for the main pickup, the other for the reserve.
So, again assuming I understand this right, to which hose did you connect your current petcock, and what did you do with the other one?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:14 pm (UTC)I figured out which one was reserve, by seeing which one still had fuel coming out when I was draining the last half gallon of gas out of the tank. Then I confirmed it after putting it all back together, by putting in less than a gallon of new gas for my test ride. It still ran, so I must have picked the right one.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:53 pm (UTC)Anyway, why not just use two valves, or a three-way valve, and get the main v. reserve functionality back?
(I was going to link to a potentially appropriate three-way valve, but Swagelok's website just exploded.)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 11:58 pm (UTC)Swagelok can be a little pricey, however. There may be ways around that, though.
Do you know what the outside diameter of your fuel line is? (Swagelok fittings are sized by OD.)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:15 pm (UTC)http://www.carpe-tdm.net/ipb/index.php?showtopic=201
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 03:51 pm (UTC)There was a long hose on one of the synch ports, that connected to the fuel pump. I just capped that hose, so I won't have to get in there for that port; I can just hook in to that hose. There's a hose on the other synch port too but I can't see where it goes. I will excavate it and find out. Maybe it's just routed off somewhere and capped as well.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:07 pm (UTC)Don't those sound like famous last words?
But yeah, if it's still partly disassembled, it should be a piece of cake.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 04:43 am (UTC)Unfortunately I had to take off the airbox to reach the synch screw, and I still couldn't turn it without rolling the throttle all the way to the stop. So I ended up turning the bike off and on about six times. And I didn't wait for it to warm up all the way, since I didn't want to run it for that long with no air filter.
But they came into synch pretty quickly. Twins are a complete cakewalk compared to fours, for this stuff. Once they seemed close enough, I put the airbox back on and ran it until it was warm, and monitored the vacuum lines, and they were still within about 1/8" of each other, which is good. They were about 1.5" apart, so that should smooth things out a lot. And with less vibration maybe the new emulsion tubes won't wear out as fast.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 01:02 pm (UTC)Are the carbs in proper working order now? :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 02:11 pm (UTC)The rewards seem to be worth the effort though.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:11 pm (UTC)Hmm... Want to wake up early some Saturday morning and ride to the Ren Fair with me?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:58 pm (UTC)OTOH, if the weather's good, the TDM would be more fun anyway, so I might take it regardless. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-04 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 10:45 pm (UTC)